The central distinction

limx→a f(x) = L

This statement says that f(x) can be made as close to L as desired by taking x sufficiently close to a, while keeping x distinct from a. The expression does not require f(a) to equal L, and it does not even require f(a) to be defined.

Three values that must not be confused

QuantityQuestion
f(a)What value, if any, is assigned at the point?
limx→a- f(x)What is approached from values smaller than a?
limx→a+ f(x)What is approached from values larger than a?

A finite two-sided limit exists only when the left- and right-hand limits both exist and agree. A jump has two unequal finite one-sided limits. A vertical asymptote can produce infinite one-sided behavior. Oscillation may prevent either from settling.

A removable singularity

f(x) = sin(x)/x for x ≠ 0,   yet   limx→0 sin(x)/x = 1

The formula is undefined at zero because it asks for division by zero. Nevertheless, nearby values approach 1 from both sides. Defining f(0)=1 fills the hole and creates a continuous extension.

Evidence is layered.A table can suggest a limit, a graph can reveal structure, and algebra can transform the expression. A proof establishes that the claimed closeness holds for every permitted tolerance.

The precise idea

For every ε greater than zero, there must be a δ greater than zero such that whenever 0 < |x-a| < δ, the output satisfies |f(x)-L| < ε. The excluded center, 0 < |x-a|, is what separates approach behavior from the point value.

Sources